On the initiative of Minister of Justice, Raphael A. Boasman, officials of the Ministry of Justice of St. Maarten joined the more than 150 representatives of governments and criminal justice authorities of the 34 countries and territories of the Americas, private sector and international organizations to participate in the Hemispheric Forum on International Cooperation against Cybercrime in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, from the 5th to the 7th of December 2017.
Participating countries and territories included Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Curacao, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Montserrat, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, Suriname, Uruguay and USA.
The Forum was aimed at permitting participating countries to make better use of capacity building programs of international organizations, to enhance cooperation and synergies between International organizations and initiatives, and to share experience on the strengthening of capacity building for criminal justice authorities.
Cybercrime is a fast-growing area of crime. More and more criminals are exploiting the speed, convenience and anonymity of the Internet to commit a diverse range of criminal activities that know no borders, either physical or virtual, cause serious harm and pose very real threats to victims worldwide.
In accordance with different worldwide sources, cybercrime is costing the world economy up to US $500 billion a year. Cybercrime and issues related to electronic evidence undermine the social and economic development opportunities of information technologies as well as human rights, democracy and the rule of law. A more effective criminal justice response and cooperation at all levels are needed.
Legislation on cybercrime and electronic evidence is the basis for such a response. An increasing
number of countries in the Americas have adopted or, like St. Maarten, are in the process of adopting domestic legislation, using the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime as a guideline. This Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe is the only binding international instrument on this issue. Its main objective is to pursue a common criminal policy aimed at the protection of society against cybercrime, especially by adopting appropriate legislation and fostering international co-operation. The Convention serves as a guideline for any country developing comprehensive national legislation against Cybercrime and as a framework for international cooperation between State Parties to this treaty. It is the first international treaty on crimes committed via the Internet and other computer networks, dealing particularly with infringements of copyright, computer-related fraud, child pornography and violations of network security. It also contains a series of powers and procedures such as the search of computer networks and interception.
Also, with the growing relevance of information and communication technologies for societies around the world and thus their vulnerability to threats such as cybercrime a major capacity building effort is required to enable criminal justice authorities to investigate, prosecute and adjudicate offences against and by means of computers as well as other offences entailing electronic evidence.
Capacity building is an effective way to permit countries strengthen legislation, institutional capacities
and cooperation at all levels. An example of good practice and offer of further support is the project of the European Union and the Council of Europe on Global Action on
Cybercrime Extended (GLACY+).
The several workshops of the Council of Europe, OAS, US Department of Justice, Interpol and other International/regional organizations and other countries focused on a wide range of topics, i.a.:
– Capacity building and obligatory certification of police officers in digital evidence and cybercrime investigations;
– TOR, The Dark Web and Bitcoin: The technical background needed and an example of a successful investigation and prosecution;
– Access to evidence in the cloud;
– Procedural and Substantive Laws: how courts evaluate admissibility of digital evidence;
– International community in the fight against cybercrime;
It should be recognized that combating cybercrime is not a sole responsibility of the public
sector but also of the private sector. It is important to promote a platform for high levels of
cooperation between the private and public sectors. Currently, geopolitical changes, the
acceleration of technological developments and the evolution of attacks have caused a
response gap between policies and real-time effective execution. All parties will need to
participate in the creation of a pragmatic legal framework that will permit law enforcement to
perform their duties while protecting individual privacy and facilitate cooperation between
countries. INTERPOL is focusing resources to expand its information sharing agreements with private
sector to produce actionable intelligence for member countries. Participating countries to the
Cyber Surge urged INTERPOL to continue producing and disseminating intelligence through
its official channels.
Cybercrime related cases are complicated and require tenacity, resources, intelligence,
patience by the investigators, and coordination between the different governmental
institutions. This will seek to ensure the success of tracking, investigating, capturing, and
processing of criminals. Occasionally, criminals make mistakes. Those mistakes in turn can be used for the investigation and prosecution of said criminals and bring them to justice.
International cooperation in cyber related cases is very important for the exchange of
experiences and technical assistance. In particular, in cases that have not been encountered before.
It is the responsibility of investigators and prosecutors to explain the technical aspects of
complex issues in clear and simple terms to judges and juries.
As electronic evidence is increasingly stored on servers in the cloud, specific measures are
needed to secure such evidence for criminal justice purposes. The work of the Cybercrime
Convention Committee within the framework of the Budapest Convention is noted, including
the negotiation of a Protocol on access to evidence in the cloud which started in September
2017. It is also noted that private sector entities are prepared to cooperate with public
authorities. Governments may consider following the work of the Cybercrime Convention
Committee on a Protocol to the Budapest Convention and accession to this treaty.
Cooperation between international organizations
The developments of an international and national level call of consciousness are the grounds
for effective actions. There is a need to reassess and renew the current international legal
frameworks, to offer a forum for broader international discussion expressing an outlook
towards increasing and advancing international law-enforcement and judicial cooperation
among the national authorities and between international and regional organizations. These
developments should consider the influences of new and emerging issues in respect of
international law-enforcement and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, alongside with
recommendations on capacity-building. These recommendations should show an equal
concern for the situation in countries at different stages of development in order to avoid a
chaotic future.
In terms of the way ahead:
States should adopt appropriate domestic legal frameworks on cybercrime and electronic evidence,
in line with international standards, such as the Budapest Convention;
States – with the support of international organizations – should continue to build capacities and skills
of law enforcement agencies, prosecution services, and judiciary;
Criminal justice authorities should strengthen cooperation with the private sector that will enable
timely access to data;
Streamline procedures involved in the processing of mutual legal assistance requests. States may
consider accession to the Budapest Convention as a framework for international cooperation;
International organizations should further enhance their cooperation with each other and seek
synergies in capacity building activities.
Speakers repeatedly emphasized the importance of communication and cooperation between
governments and the private sector, particularly in the case of countries that do not yet have firmly
established relationships with common providers.
There was an agreement among the participants on the need to work on capacity building strategies
for operators of the criminal justice system about the challenges of computer-related crime and digital
evidence. To promote interdisciplinary courses of legal and technical content. To promote “training of
trainers” in the different countries of the region and to promote a better use of the resources for
international cooperation.
Acknowledgement of the importance of the creation of special prosecution offices to deal with
cybercrime and to promote joint activities and links among special prosecutors’ units at a regional
level.
It was also acknowledged the need of new criminal procedure laws regarding digital evidence and the
creation of procedural powers. It is recommended the use of the Budapest Convention as a
guideline.
It was accepted the urgent need to work on new rules (at the international and national level)
regarding trans-border access to data and data in the cloud. Further, it was considered important the
inclusion of an additional protocol to the Budapest convention regarding: data preservation,
production search and seizure orders when data is in another jurisdiction.