Member of Parliament convicted for bribery to 32 months imprisonment and a 7 year ban on holding public office in ‘Ruby’ case

C.B., a Member of Parliament was sentenced by The Court of First
Instance to an unconditional prison sentence of thirty-two (32) months and to a 7-year ban on holding public office for his role in the Ruby case.
The suspicion against C.B. was focused on corruption during his tenure as Head of Infrastructure at the Ministry of Public Housing, Spatial Planning, Environment, and Infrastructure (VROMI) and the misuse of public funds for personal purposes.
C.B. was found guilty of requesting and accepting bribes of over 600.000 guilders in a period of 2.5 years in relation to the tendering procedure for management contracts of the landfill on Sint Maarten. The bribes included lucrative contracts for his wife and son. He was also convicted for
forging invoices related to the sewage plant in order for VROMI to pay for personal expenses for his family and the Lions Club.
C.B. was acquitted for the abuse of power related to the relocation of a business premises operated by his family members on a parcel on Kim Sha Beach.
Co-suspect M.B.M. was sentenced to 10 months unconditional imprisonment. She was found guilty of taking bribes in association with her husband C.B. The Court took into account that M.B.M. was previously convicted for fraud.
The Court ruled that the behavior of M.B.M. and C.B. in particular, inflicted damage to the trust of the people of Sint Maarten and damage to the integrity of the public administration. As role models, they should have only acted in the interest of the people of Sint Maarten. Also did neither C.B. nor
M.B.M. show any acknowledgement or insight in the criminality of their actions.
The other two suspects L.L. and R.F. each received a 12-month conditional prison sentences and 210 hours of community service for paying the bribes. Their corporate entity they used in the tender procedure was convicted to a conditional fine of 100.000 guilders. The Court took into consideration
that although their acts were severely undermining to society, they do not deserve an unconditional prison sentence as they cooperated with the investigation and offered, to a certain extent, insight into the facts even though they incriminated themselves with their openness in the matter. It was also taken into account that the C.B. and M.B.M. had a significantly more active role in staging the corrupt microsystem than L.L and R.F. had.
The sentences were slightly lower than requested by the Prosecutor’s Office because of undue delay in the Ruby Case. However, this does not apply to the ban on holding public office: the Court ruled that due to the severity of this case, a five-year ban is not adequate and it should be seven years
The outcome of this case shows that the justice system takes crimes that harm the country, and by extension every member of the society, very serious. This type of crime is even more damaging to the community when perpetrated by people who should serve as role models and guardians of the patrimony of the people. Civil servants and those contracted by government to execute tasks on its behalf must carry these out with the good of the country and its people in mind and not betray the
trust and confidence placed in them. 
The Ruby investigation was started in July 2018 by the RST Investigation Team under the authority of the Anti-Corruption Taskforce (TBO) of the Attorney-General’s Office of Curacao, St. Maarten, Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba, due to strong indications of structural mismanagement of the landfill
which resulted in serious health risks for the community of Sint Maarten.
On February 12, 2021, the Court of Appeals of Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten, and the BES-islands ordered the prosecution of C.B. This order was required as the Constitution of Sint Maarten and the National Ordinance of individuals with Political Authority prescribe that the Prosecutor’s Office can only prosecute individuals with political authority after an order to that effect has been issued by the Court of Appeals.
For a well-functioning democratic society, it is essential that citizens have confidence in their government and public administration. Administrative corruption is a multi-faceted phenomenon that occurs typically at the interface of public and private interests. Corruption can permanently
disrupt a society, it undermines the integrity of the government and leads to unfair commercial competition. For this reason, TBO takes indications of corruption very serious and, if necessary, has them thoroughly investigated.